Skip to main content
News > Blog > Recognition for Scientific Discovery, an Added Inducement to Use OpenTherapeutics.net

Recognition for Scientific Discovery, an Added Inducement to Use OpenTherapeutics.net

Alice Augusta Ball was an African American pharmacologist and chemist in the early 20th Century who developed the only effective treatment for Hansen’s Disease (leprosy) at that time. She taught chemistry at the University of Hawaii but died at age 24 before she could publish her research. Had she lived, she might still have found it challenging to get the recognition she deserved. Worse still, a male colleague took credit for her work after she died, though a later research scientist helped reinstate full acknowledgment of her remarkable work. At that time achieving recognition for successful research was an arduous task and a particular struggle for women.

Fast forward to 2017 when Open Therapeutics introduces Therapoid™, a research platform that launches this summer. With this new digital community, researchers worldwide will have the opportunity to take credit for their research, through collaboration of shared data and publication of their manuscripts. With Therapoid, today’s research community will have access to a digital platform that truly advances the open data principle.

In addition to its breakthrough research capabilities, Therapoid will resolve one of the current problems of competition among researchers for publications and citations, a disincentive to data sharing. Current practice does not include the data producers as authors on papers published by subsequent data users. Thus, producers have little incentive to make the effort to share data, which they might themselves use in future publications. That will change with Therapoid as it offers cooperative authorship of research.

Sharing of data used and produced in biomedical research is still not practiced widely enough in the biomedical sphere, although it has been called for by the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, the UK Research Council and others. There is a pervasive culture of peer review and perceived risk of being “scooped,” which are among the issues that have prevented the widespread adoption of biomedical data sharing, says Leigh Finnegan in her 2015 article Publish or Perish – How Can Publishers Support Open Data in DataScience@NIH . She writes that for those building their careers, and particularly for underrepresented groups who already face barriers in academia, being open isn’t as popular as it is likely to be in the future. Therapoid will make it more likely that data and science researchers will collaborate more freely.

“There’s a generation of scientists who are running labs and running tenure committees who were brought up on a very different system,” says Virginia Barbour, who has worked at the Public Library of Science—one of the groups at the forefront of the open access battle. “I have huge hopes on the generation that’s coming up, because they’re a generation built on openness and availability….” (Rose Eveleth’s, Free Access to Science Research Doesn’t Benefit Everyone, The Atlantic, Twitter @roseeveleth).

Open Therapeutics’ Therapoid expects to be one of the most exciting drivers of that openness and availability.

3/2017

We Believe

Open Therapeutics crowdsources orphan and dormant therapeutic intellectual properties (IP) to scientists around the world. The goal is pushing forward research that ordinarily would not generate a public value while particularly helping underserved scientists to collaborate.

How open science helps researchers succeed
Open access, open data, open source, and other open scholarship practices are growing in popularity and necessity. However, widespread adoption of these practices has not yet been achieved. One reason is that researchers are uncertain about how sharing their work will affect their careers. We review literature demonstrating that open research is associated with increases in citations, media attention, potential collaborators, job opportunities, and funding opportunities. These findings are evidence that open research practices bring significant benefits to researchers relative to more traditional closed practices.